· 3/4/1988
In Re Monroe Communications Corporation
Citations
- 840 F.2d 942
- 268 U.S. App. D.C. 235
- 64 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 833
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777
- 1988 WL 17681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to issue the writ despite the agency’s 3-year delay since the ALJ’s initial decision, and 5-year delay since the start of agency proceedings
- stating its consideration of whether the agency’s inaction is “unreasonably slow”
- in mandamus action, 17 18 three years of “administrative limbo” not unreasonable considering the great latitude given 19 agencies to determine their own agendas
- courts “must give agencies great latitude in determining their agendas”
- courts “must give agencies great latitude in determining their agendas.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Starr, Silberman, Greene
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.