Skip to main content
· 3/4/1988

In Re Monroe Communications Corporation

Citations

  • 840 F.2d 942
  • 268 U.S. App. D.C. 235
  • 64 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 833
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777
  • 1988 WL 17681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to issue the writ despite the agency’s 3-year delay since the ALJ’s initial decision, and 5-year delay since the start of agency proceedings
  • stating its consideration of whether the agency’s inaction is “unreasonably slow”
  • in mandamus action, 17 18 three years of “administrative limbo” not unreasonable considering the great latitude given 19 agencies to determine their own agendas
  • courts “must give agencies great latitude in determining their agendas”
  • courts “must give agencies great latitude in determining their agendas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Starr, Silberman, Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.