Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 6/7/2018

Martin v. O'Rourke

Citations

  • 891 F.3d 1338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the TRAC standard is the appropri- ate standard for the Veterans Court to use in evaluating mandamus petitions alleging unreasonable delay
  • holding that the TRAC factors provide an appropriate framework for analyzing mandamus petitions alleging unreasonable delay in VA proceedings
  • concluding that the TRAC standard is the appropri- ate standard for the Veterans Court to use in evaluating mandamus petitions alleging unreasonable delay
  • holding that TRAC factors provide the appro- priate framework for analyzing mandamus petitions based on alleged unreasonable delay by the VA
  • holding that the TRAC factors provide the appropriate framework for ana- lyzing mandamus petitions based on alleged unreasonable delay by the DVA
  • explaining that the \rule of reason\ considers whether a delay is \based on complete inaction\ as opposed to compliance with statutory duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prost, Schall, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.