Skip to main content
· 1/25/2005

Emery v. Bay Capital Corp.

Citations

  • 354 F. Supp. 2d 589
  • 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 850
  • 34 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1759
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1649
  • 2005 WL 281248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n ongoing administrative scheme is not required simply because there is the need to resolve whether a termination was ‘for cause.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nickerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.