Evans v. Infirmary Health Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that “this Court’s general practice is not to consider new arguments raised in a reply brief’
• “Although they are often confused by courts and litigants alike, complete preemption and defensive preemption are distinct questions, dependent on different tests and bearing different implications for a lawsuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).