Skip to main content
· 9/11/2002

Donovan v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.

Citations

  • 220 F. Supp. 2d 560
  • 29 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1327
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17160
  • 2002 WL 31055187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the lump-sum payment of a severance benefit to be evidence of lack of an administrative scheme
  • “ ‘[C]ause’ is specifically and narrowly defined, rather than entirely a matter of BB & T’s discretion ... the [agreement] removes all discretion from BB & T as to the amount of benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.