Skip to main content

Elmer v. State

Citations

  • 114 So. 3d 198
  • 2012 WL 4838884
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] prior inconsistent statement admitted for impeachment purposes is not hearsay because it is not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted.”
  • “[A] prior inconsistent statement admitted for impeachment purposes is not hearsay because it is not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted.” (citation omitted
  • “When the witness does not ‘distinctly admit’ making the prior statement, including when he or she claims an inability to remember it, extrinsic evidence is admissible to prove that the statement was made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen, Palmer, Torpy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.