District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/27/1984
Watts v. State
Citations
- 450 So. 2d 265
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was error to limit the defendant’s cross-examination of a State witness regarding the witness’s probationary status at the time of trial because such evidence could be used to demonstrate the witness’s bias or motive for testifying
- error to limit defendant's cross-examination of key prosecution witness where witness was granted leniency because of his cooperation in defendant's case
- “In a criminal trial the defendant has the absolute right to fully cross-examine adverse witnesses to discredit them by showing bias, prejudice, interest, or possible ulteri- or motive for testifying. This is particularly so where a key witness is being examined.”
- prejudice from limitation of cross-examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Danahy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-20· cited 49×
- Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-02· cited 27×
- State v. SabogHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2005-04-21· cited 19×
- Livingston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-21· cited 18×
- Phillips v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-28· cited 13×
- Lusk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-30· cited 13×
- Marr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-14· cited 13×
- Yolman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-03· cited 13×
- Coleman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-20· cited 13×
- Carlyle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-29· cited 11×
- Alvarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-16· cited 9×
- Caton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-22· cited 9×
- Elmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-12· cited 9×
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-10· cited 7×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 7×
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-24· cited 4×
- Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-03· cited 2×
- Nieves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-16· cited 1×
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-27
- Campbell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-28
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 391×
- Moreno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-07· cited 26×
- Mendez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-21· cited 22×
- Cowheard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-05· cited 19×
- Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-17· cited 12×
- Hannah v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-31· cited 11×
- Engram v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-24· cited 6×
- Russo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-01· cited 5×
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-09-19· cited 4×
- Garey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-15· cited 3×
- O'Neil v. Travelers Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.