Skip to main content

Watts v. State

Citations

  • 450 So. 2d 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was error to limit the defendant’s cross-examination of a State witness regarding the witness’s probationary status at the time of trial because such evidence could be used to demonstrate the witness’s bias or motive for testifying
  • error to limit defendant's cross-examination of key prosecution witness where witness was granted leniency because of his cooperation in defendant's case
  • “In a criminal trial the defendant has the absolute right to fully cross-examine adverse witnesses to discredit them by showing bias, prejudice, interest, or possible ulteri- or motive for testifying. This is particularly so where a key witness is being examined.”
  • prejudice from limitation of cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.