Pugh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that error in not admitting portion of pretrial deposition as prior inconsistent statement to impeach key prosecution witness was not harmless as this was only witness to claim defendant was directly involved in robbery and holding gun
• finding error in not admitting prior inconsistent portions of witness's deposition into evidence when witness stated that \he did not remember the questions he was asked nor the answers he gave during his deposition\
• reversing and remanding for new trial where court improperly excluded use of pretrial deposition to impeach witness who “did not distinctly admit” to making inconsistent statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pearce v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-01· cited 83×
• MBL Life Assur. Corp. v. Suarez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-23· cited 10×
• Elmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-12· cited 9×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-13· cited 3×
• Martin v. Metropolitan Dade County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-24
• David Michael Carnright v. The State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-31

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• McArthur v. Cook
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-12-20· cited 49×
• Fogel v. Mirmelli
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-06· cited 13×