Hutchens v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Faretta and our rules of criminal procedure place the duty of inquiry upon the trial court.”
• “When an accused, as here, seeks to invoke his constitutional right of self-representation, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Goldsmith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-29· cited 10×
• Elmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-12· cited 9×
• Watkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-15· cited 3×
• Betts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-30· cited 3×
• Combs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-14· cited 3×
• Hinson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-12-03
• Jordan v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-03-25

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
• State v. Bowen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 70×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-28· cited 52×
• Saffor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-13· cited 50×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-30· cited 27×
• Barton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-29· cited 23×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-22· cited 7×
• Vera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-26· cited 7×
• Neeld v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-24· cited 3×