Indiana Court of Appeals· 12/13/1999
Spry v. State
Citations
- 720 N.E.2d 1167
- 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 2152
- 1999 WL 1143733
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Merging, without also vacating [lesser included] convictions, is not sufficient.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirsch, Sharpnack, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-25· cited 95×
- Payton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-30· cited 41×
- Morrison v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-03-31· cited 29×
- Edmond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-06-17· cited 17×
- Leitch v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-30· cited 8×
- Minix v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-11· cited 2×
- Freida A Starks v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2023-05-11
- MICHAEL T OWENS v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2023-03-28
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 824×
- Spradlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-04-15· cited 191×
- Edgecomb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-11-01· cited 98×
- Simmons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 36×
- Redman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-06· cited 27×
- Buzzard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-06-17· cited 26×
- Webster v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-03-31· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.