Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 799 N.E.2d 42
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 2165
  • 2003 WL 22764886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because defendant objected at trial on relevancy grounds, he waived his Rule 404(b) argument on appeal
  • holding the victims' unequivocal identifications of defendant as the person who shot them were sufficient to support convictions for attempted murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brook, Baker, Sharpnack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.