Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/20/2004
Vaughn v. State
Citations
- 607 S.E.2d 72
- 362 S.C. 163
- 2004 S.C. LEXIS 296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting improper closing argument by the solicitor may be excused under the \invited reply\ doctrine if the solicitor's conduct was an appropriate response to statements or arguments made by the defense
- solicitor’s comments not proper under invited response doctrine where there was no evidence to support them
- “Conduct that would otherwise be improper may be excused under the ‘invited reply’ doctrine if the prosecutor’s conduct was an appropriate response to statements or arguments made by the defense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 32×
- Tappeiner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-05-04· cited 15×
- Bowman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-01-10· cited 15×
- Ellenburg v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 10×
- State v. CollierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-10-04· cited 2×
- State v. MaziqueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-10-19· cited 1×
- State v. Jaron GibbsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-01-04
- Washington v. State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2025-01-15
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 4,689×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 647×
- State v. EngelNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-07-02· cited 137×
- State v. ShulerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 104×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-27· cited 82×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 68×
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-05-26· cited 26×
- Edmond v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 21×
- State v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-04-17· cited 20×
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-06-17· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.