Edenfield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “since there are no ‘magic words’ required in a Faretta inquiry, there is no requirement that any specific questions be asked”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Neal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-11· cited 6×
• Vega v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-25· cited 5×
• Sylvester Hooks v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-05· cited 3×
• State of Florida v. Steven Pietrasiuk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-18· cited 1×
• Edenfield v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-03-15
• Newton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-20

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann
  Supreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
• Iowa v. Tovar
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 747×
• State v. Bowen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 70×
• Hill v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 53×
• Potts v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-09-10· cited 32×
• Rogers v. Singletary
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 18×
• Hen Lin Lu v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 17×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-26· cited 13×
• Gillespie v. City of Destin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-28· cited 13×
• Flowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-13· cited 12×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-07· cited 9×
• Houck v. Florida Parole Commission
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-04· cited 8×
• Beaton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-01· cited 7×