Vega v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even if a trial court validly concludes a defendant was merely attempting to delay proceedings, it is nonetheless required to conduct an adequate inquiry
• “trial courts are not bound to follow the model Faretta colloquy suggested by the supreme court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Snell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-09
• Sylvester Hooks v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-28
• Meredith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-22
• Meyers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-21
• ELLIOT SHAWN BUTLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-11-29

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Blake v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-12-13· cited 77×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-28· cited 52×
• Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(2)-(3)
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-07-16· cited 31×
• Segal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-01· cited 10×
• Edenfield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-10· cited 8×
• Burton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-06· cited 6×
• Potts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-30· cited 4×
• Reeves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-13· cited 2×