Neal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]hile the model colloquy contained in the rules is very helpful, failure to follow it to the letter does not compel a finding that a defendant has not made a knowing and intelligent choice of self- representation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sylvester Hooks v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-05· cited 3×
• Gibson Paul v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-15· cited 2×
• Vollmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-07· cited 2×
• Cleveland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-08· cited 2×
• Sylvester Hooks v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-28

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-10-04· cited 1,882×
• Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-28· cited 400×
• Traylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-16· cited 375×
• Morrison v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 104×
• State v. Bowen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 70×
• Potts v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-09-10· cited 32×
• Boyd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-03· cited 19×
• Guilder v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-30· cited 15×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-05· cited 15×
• Edenfield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-10· cited 8×