Skip to main content

Potts v. State

Citations

  • 718 So. 2d 757
  • 1998 WL 574310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a decision regarding a sufficient Faretta inquiry “turns primarily on [the trial court’s] assessment of demeanor and credibility”
  • the trial court's decision regarding self-representation \is entitled to great weight and will be affirmed on review if supported by competent substantial evidence\
  • “As with other constitutional rights, the right of self-representation is best safeguarded not by an arcane maze of magic words and reversible error traps, but by reason and common sense.” (citation omitted; emphasis added)
  • “In assessing the validity of a waiver of counsel, a reviewing court should focus not on the specific advice rendered by the trial court—for there are no ‘magic words’ under Faretta—but rather on the defendant’s general understanding of his or her rights[.]” (emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.