Supreme Court of Florida· 9/10/1998
Potts v. State
Citations
- 718 So. 2d 757
- 1998 WL 574310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a decision regarding a sufficient Faretta inquiry “turns primarily on [the trial court’s] assessment of demeanor and credibility”
- the trial court's decision regarding self-representation \is entitled to great weight and will be affirmed on review if supported by competent substantial evidence\
- “As with other constitutional rights, the right of self-representation is best safeguarded not by an arcane maze of magic words and reversible error traps, but by reason and common sense.” (citation omitted; emphasis added)
- “In assessing the validity of a waiver of counsel, a reviewing court should focus not on the specific advice rendered by the trial court—for there are no ‘magic words’ under Faretta—but rather on the defendant’s general understanding of his or her rights[.]” (emphasis supplied)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Muehleman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-02-19· cited 32×
- Albert Holland, Jr. v. State of FLoridaEleventh Circuit· 2014-12-29· cited 15×
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-26· cited 13×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-23· cited 13×
- McCarthy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-14· cited 12×
- Langon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-28· cited 11×
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-04· cited 11×
- Ingraham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-28· cited 10×
- Segal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-01· cited 10×
- Edenfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-10· cited 8×
- Morgan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-01· cited 6×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-22· cited 6×
- Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-11· cited 6×
- Weaver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-16· cited 3×
- Sylvester Hooks v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-05· cited 3×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-23· cited 1×
- Christopher J. Mars v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-03· cited 1×
- Sylvester Hooks v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2019-12-19
- SIR MICHAEL MAPS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-03-31
- Barry A. Noetzel v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2021-11-10
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
- Melbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-05· cited 356×
- Peter R. Fitzpatrick v. Louie L. WainwrightEleventh Circuit· 1986-11-20· cited 137×
- Willacy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 127×
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 70×
- Griffin-El v. BowersoxSupreme Court· 1998-01-20· cited 65×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 53×
- Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(2)-(3)Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-07-16· cited 31×
- Rogers v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 18×
- Dortch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-16· cited 4×
- Potts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.