Skip to main content
· 11/27/1996

Hen Lin Lu v. State

Citations

  • 683 So. 2d 1110
  • 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12499
  • 1996 WL 685579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and remanding for an evidentiary hearing due to the absence of a transcript of the plea colloquy when the issue was whether the plea form alone was sufficient to demonstrate compliance with rule 3.172(c)(8)
  • judges are not precluded from using preprinted rights forms as a part of a plea colloquy as long as the colloquy reflects that a defendant has intelligently understood the written information contained within them
  • Pre-printed plea form containing rights advisements may be used by Court to inform defendant of all rights he is waiving, as long as Court orally verifies that defendant has intelligently consumed the written information contained within it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.