Flowers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding inquiry inadequate where the court “did advise the defendant of the disadvantages and dangers of self-representation,” but did not “inquire into the defendant’s age, education, ability to read and write, or any mental or physical conditions.”
• Faretta inquiry inadequate where trial court “did not advise the defendant of the advantages of representation by counsel nor ... inquire into the defendant’s age, education, ability to read and write, or any mental or physical conditions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Howard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-26· cited 12×
• Edenfield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-10· cited 8×
• McGee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-20· cited 6×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-22· cited 6×
• Birlkey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-24· cited 5×
• Cleveland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-08· cited 2×
• Silva v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-02· cited 1×
• Scott A. Stanley v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-30· cited 1×
• Petty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-30
• Meredith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Beaton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-01· cited 7×
• Case v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-29· cited 6×