Skip to main content

Tucker v. State

Citations

  • 990 S.W.2d 261
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 23
  • 1999 WL 155912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that pretrial motion to suppress does not preserve error when defendant affirmatively asserts during trial that he has “no objection” to admission of complained of evidence
  • stating that pretrial motion to suppress does not preserve error when defendant affirmatively asserts during trial that he has “no objection” to admission of complained of evidence
  • finding that prerequisite to presenting a complaint for appellate review is showing in record that complaint was made to trial court by request, objection, or motion that was timely and sufficiently specific to make trial court aware of grounds of complaint
  • holding \okay\ did not waive right to make opening statement
  • holding “okay” did not waive right to make opening statement
  • stating appellant must obtain adverse ruling to present complaint on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

111 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.