Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/26/1992
Dunn v. State
Citations
- 486 N.W.2d 428
- 1992 Minn. LEXIS 178
- 1992 WL 142210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that State did not introduce excessive number of autopsy photos corroborating examiner and eyewitness testimonies, nor was the content unduly prejudicial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gardebring
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-03-26· cited 36×
- State v. HallmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-05-15· cited 36×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-09-25· cited 32×
- State v. JuarezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-10-02· cited 9×
- Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-04-30· cited 8×
- Simmons v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-12-31· cited 5×
- Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-05-14· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-03-31· cited 305×
- State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-01-13· cited 123×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-08· cited 119×
- Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-06-08· cited 66×
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-08-02· cited 43×
- State v. CrockerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-07-24· cited 41×
- State v. NielsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-04-05· cited 21×
- Skavene v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-06-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.