Skip to main content

Duncan v. State

Citations

  • 95 S.W.3d 669
  • 2002 WL 31941498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that admission of outcry witness's testimony was harmless when several instances of similar testimony were developed and offered without objection, including testimony of complainant, who testified in detail about abuse
  • holding improper admission of outcry testimony was harmless error because similar testimony was admitted through complainant, pediatrician, and medical records
  • holding improper admission of outcry testimony 8 was harmless error because similar testimony was admitted through complainant, pediatrician, and medical records
  • holding improper admission of outcry testimony was harmless error because similar testimony was admitted through complainant, pediatrician, and medical records
  • holding improper admission of outcry testimony was harmless because similar facts were admitted through complainant, pediatrician, and medical records
  • holding improper admission of outcry testimony was harmless error because similar testimony was admitted through complainant, pediatrician, and medical records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adele Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.