Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 131 S.W.3d 928
  • 2004 WL 743722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the requirement to conduct a reliability hearing was not invoked because appellant failed to request a hearing
  • Holding that a child’s statement that the “appellant ‘had been performing oral sex on him’ did not relay any specific details about the charged offense” and was a “general allusion” to sexual abuse.
  • where testimony was that defendant “had been performing oral sex on [child] for about a year,” the testimony did not relay specific details about charged offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child
  • where testimony was that defendant “had been performing oral sex on [child] for about a year,” the testimony did not relay specific details about charged offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnot, Wright, McCall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.