Duggan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]o be admissible to refute the allegation of recent fabrication, improper influence, or improper motive, the prior statement must predate the alleged fabrication, influence, or motive.”
• trial court erred in admitting 4 “Georgia had no statute governing the admission of prior consistent statements in the pre-2013 [evidence] code. OCGA § 24-6-613 (c
• in determining whether error in admitting prior consistent statements of a witness is harmless, court may not rely on the fact that the witness gave testimony at trial that was consistent with the prior statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).