· 11/22/1989
Luken v. State
Citations
- 780 S.W.2d 264
- 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206
- 1989 WL 140346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that State may seek deadly weapon finding and that “an affirmative finding of use or exhibition of a deadly weapon must be supported by a written pleading, albeit not necessarily in the indictment”
- observing “that ‘[a]n affirmative finding can be and is perhaps more suited to be a punishment issue’”
- requiring that the notice be in writing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.