Skip to main content
· 11/22/1989

Luken v. State

Citations

  • 780 S.W.2d 264
  • 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206
  • 1989 WL 140346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that State may seek deadly weapon finding and that “an affirmative finding of use or exhibition of a deadly weapon must be supported by a written pleading, albeit not necessarily in the indictment”
  • observing “that ‘[a]n affirmative finding can be and is perhaps more suited to be a punishment issue’”
  • requiring that the notice be in writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.