Miller v. Pate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s due process rights were violated where prosecutor’s argument intentionally misrepresented the evidence
• holding that a prosecutor commits misconduct by misrepresenting the facts in the record
• Holding that it was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment for a prosecutor to represent that a pair of shorts were blood-stained shorts, when the shorts were actually stained by paint.
• holding that a prosecutor commits misconduct by misrepresenting the facts in the record
• holding that a capital defendant’s due process rights were violated when the State falsely represented that his shorts were stained with blood, when they were actually stained with paint
• holding that prosecutor’s “knowing use of false evidence” violated due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).