Skip to main content

Bingham v. State

Citations

  • 915 S.W.2d 9
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 145
  • 1994 WL 880500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that counsel’s failure to object to proper jury argument is not ineffective assistance of counsel
  • finding that evidence referring to possible characteristics as being “knifelike” in nature was insufficient to prove that weapon was knife
  • holding words used in their ordinary sense should be read in context
  • holding words used in their ordinary sense should be read in context
  • determining a fourteen‑hour delay is excessive for an excited utterance exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Baird, Maloney, Clinton, White, McCormick, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

130 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bingham v. State

41 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.