Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/27/1983

Mitchell v. State

Citations

650 S.W.2d 801
1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that evidence independent of accomplice witnesses tended to connect appellant with crime charged and sufficiently corroborated accomplice witness’s testimony
holding that evidence independent of accomplice witnesses tended to connect appellant with crime charged and sufficiently corroborated accomplice witness = s testimony
holding that evidence independent of accomplice witnesses tended to connect appellant with crime charged and sufficiently corroborated accomplice witness = s testimony
holding that evidence independent of accomplice witnesses tended to connect appellant with crime charged and sufficiently corroborated accomplice witness’s testimony
holding presence of the accused with the accomplice may, when coupled with the other circumstances, be sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony
stating the accused’s presence with the accomplice, in conjunction with other circumstances, may be sufficient to corroborate accomplice-witness testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Clinton, Teague, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

115 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.