Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 11/13/1964

Dredge Corp. v. Penny

Citations

  • 338 F.2d 456
  • 1 A.L.R. Fed. 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that dismissal for failure to join a party must be decided on a motion to dismiss, not summary judgment
  • dismissal for failure to join an indispensable party should rarely if ever result in dismissal of the action with prejudice
  • “The opportunity to be heard orally on questions of law is not an inherent element of procedural due process, even where substantial questions of law are involved.”
  • “The opportunity to be heard orally on questions of law is not an inherent element of procedural due process, even where substantial questions of law are involved.”
  • “The opportunity to be heard orally on questions of law is not an inherent element of procedural due process, even where substantial questions of law are involved.”
  • “The opportunity to be heard orally on questions of law is not an inherent element of procedural due process, even where substantial questions of law are involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Dredge Corp. v. Penny

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.