Skip to main content
D. Alaska· 11/16/1992

United States v. Cheely

Citations

  • 814 F. Supp. 1430
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20591
  • 1992 WL 409453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining “ ordinary course of duties” to exclude “ ad hoc monitoring of a single inmate” and distinguishing Camptn
  • “I share the concern expressed by the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Daniels, that this reasoning turns acquiescence into consent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

81 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Cheely

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.