Donald G. Hamilton v. Keystone Tankship Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing summary 1 judgment for the moving party, despite absence of opposition or statements of 2 genuine issues of fact by the opponent, because “the movant’s papers on their face 3 are clearly insufficient to support a motion for summary judgment”
• “Exhibits which have not had a proper foundation laid to authenticate them 1 cannot support a motion for summary judgment” (emphasis added)
• “Rule 83 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows the district court to formulate local rules to the extent they are not inconsistent with the federal rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).