Skip to main content
· 4/6/1998

William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of Labor

Citations

  • 141 F.3d 920
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 3459
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2500
  • 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3005
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6779
  • 1998 WL 154368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming grant of summary judgment for defendant without oral argument because “a district court can decide the issue without oral argument if the parties can submit their papers to the court”
  • “[A] district court can decide the issue without oral argument if the parties can submit their papers to the court.”
  • “[A] district court can decide the issue without 25 oral argument if the parties can submit their papers to the court.”
  • “[A] district court can decide the issue without 26 oral argument if the parties can submit their papers to the court.”
  • “[A] district court can decide the issue without oral argument if the parties can submit their papers to the court.”
  • “[A] district court can decide the issue without oral argument if the parties can submit their papers to the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Hug, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.