Stephen H. Demarest v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summary affirmance in Gendron may have been based on conclusion that Gendron did not have a constitutionally protected property interest, or that while the property interest existed the fee limitation did not violate the veteran’s right to procedural due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).