Skip to main content

Dorsey v. State

Citations

  • 868 So. 2d 1192
  • 2003 WL 22964719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a juror's nonverbal behavior, which is both disputed by the parties and not evident in the record because counsel failed to ask any questions concerning the behavior, cannot be a genuine race-neutral reason to sustain a peremptory challenge
  • stating that stare decisis will yield “when there has been an error in legal analysis”
  • emphasizing that a trial court record is necessary for “meaningful appellate review”
  • emphasizing that a trial court record is necessary for \meaningful appellate review\
  • agreeing that “deference does not imply abandonment or abdication of judicial review.”
  • agreeing that “deference does not imply abandonment or abdication of judicial review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.