Skip to main content
· 3/1/2012

Bigpond v. State

Citations

  • 270 P.3d 1244
  • 128 Nev. 108
  • 128 Nev. Adv. Rep. 10
  • 2012 Nev. LEXIS 27
  • 2012 WL 669724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that evidence of other acts \may be admitted under NRS 48.045(2) for a relevant nonpropensity purpose other than those listed in the statute\
  • discussing three findings required to overcome presumption under NRS 48.045(2) that prior bad act 23 evidence is inadmissible
  • evaluating prior bad act to determine whether it is relevant to the stated nonpropensity purpose
  • modifying Tinch and explaining that the three-factor test for admissibility includes a relevance requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Hardesty, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.