Price v. J & H Marsh & McLennan, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating Supreme Court in Powerex “rejected the post-removal-event doctrine (although the Court did not call the doctrine by that name)”
• “Because [the party] was joined as a plaintiff, not as a defendant, section 1447(e) does not apply in this case.”
• “When Congress amended section 1447(c), it also created section 1447(e), permitting remand after post-removal joinder of a nondiverse defendant . . . .”
• “[S]ection 1447(d) prohibits appellate review when a district court remands based on (1) a defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction presented in a timely remand motion or (2
• “Regardless of whether the subject matter jurisdiction determination was correct on the merits . . . the District Court’s characterization of its remand order as being based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction was certainly ‘colorable.’”
• “[An] abstention-based remand order [is] reviewable by court[s] of appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).