W.R. Huff Asset Management Co. v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying SLUSA to remove and dismiss state-law claims regarding pre-en-actment conduct filed post-enactment
• “This language certainly qualifies as an ‘express command’ that prevents application of SLUSA to cases pending on the date of SLUSA’s enactment”
• \SLUSA applies retroactively to actions filed subsequent to enactment based on pre-enactment conduct\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).