· 7/28/2009
Divine v. Robbins
Citations
- 683 S.E.2d 286
- 385 S.C. 23
- 2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating to warrant reversal based on the admission or exclusion of evidence, the complaining party must prove both error and resulting prejudice
- declining to address an issue raised for the first time in a reply brief
- declining to address an issue raised for the first time in a reply brief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Geathers, Huff, Pieper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.