Skip to main content
· 7/28/2009

Divine v. Robbins

Citations

  • 683 S.E.2d 286
  • 385 S.C. 23
  • 2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating to warrant reversal based on the admission or exclusion of evidence, the complaining party must prove both error and resulting prejudice
  • declining to address an issue raised for the first time in a reply brief
  • declining to address an issue raised for the first time in a reply brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geathers, Huff, Pieper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.