Recco Tape & Label Co. v. Barfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that to warrant reversal based on admission of evidence, an appellant “must show both the error of the ruling of law and resulting prejudice.”
• “Before the Court of Appeals will reverse a judgment for an alleged error in the exclusion of evidence, the appellant must show prejudice.”
• any error in exclusion of co-defendant’s financial statements was harmless, given that such evidence would have been cumulative to testimony that co-defendant reduced the corporation’s value through the substantial use of business funds for personal expenditures
• exclusion of evidence within sound discretion of trial judge
• Davis Adv. Sh. No. 1 at 12

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).