E.D. New York· 11/3/2006
Doe No. 2 v. Kolko
Citations
- 242 F.R.D. 193
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80859
- 2006 WL 4470822
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that since defendants already knew plaintiff’s identify, “[o]ther than the need to make redactions and take measures to not disclose plaintiff’s identity, defendants will not be hampered or inconvenienced merely plaintiff’s anonymity in court papers”
- holding that, since the defendant already knew the plaintiff’s identity, “[o]ther than the need to make redactions and take measures to not disclose plaintiff’s identity, defendants will not be hampered or inconvenienced merely [by] plaintiff’s anonymity in court papers”
- concluding plaintiff’s submissions, which included psychiatrist’s declaration, “are sufficiently particularized and specific to establish a serious risk of harm to plaintiff’s mental health”
- concluding plaintiff’s submissions, which included psychiatrist’s declaration “are sufficiently particularized and specific to establish a serious risk of harm to plaintiff’s mental health”
- noting that “courts have granted anonymity to protect against disclosure of a wide range of issues involving matters of the utmost intimacy, including sexual assault” and collecting cases
- describing “sexual assault victims” as the “paradigmatic example of those entitled to a grant of anonymity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Doe v. CabreraDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-10· cited 57×
- Doe v. George Wash. Univ.D.C. Circuit· 2019-03-27· cited 30×
- Roe v. Bernabei & Wachtel PllcDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-26· cited 25×
- Uto v. Job Site Services Inc.E.D. New York· 2010-09-20· cited 23×
- 1-21 v. County of SuffolkE.D. New York· 2015-10-14· cited 20×
- Doe v. ReadeyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2023-10-27· cited 11×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 4,546×
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 1,233×
- John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedFourth Circuit· 1993-10-04· cited 455×
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2000-06-02· cited 443×
- John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1997-04-29· cited 436×
- Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2001-06-08· cited 434×
- Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. GrumetSupreme Court· 1994-06-27· cited 403×
- Guy O. Dove, Iii, Spargos Mining Nl v. Atlantic Capital CorporationSecond Circuit· 1992-04-28· cited 235×
- Huminski v. CorsonesSecond Circuit· 2005-01-18· cited 234×
- Jane Doe v. City of Chicago, and Charles WhiteSeventh Circuit· 2004-03-23· cited 114×
- Doe v. ShakurS.D. New York· 1996-01-22· cited 89×
- In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001S.D. New York· 2006-10-03· cited 64×
- EW v. New York Blood CenterE.D. New York· 2003-02-19· cited 63×
- Raiser v. Brigham Young UniversityTenth Circuit· 2005-03-29· cited 53×
- Doe v. HartzN.D. Iowa· 1999-05-05· cited 49×
- Doe v. United Services Life InsuranceS.D. New York· 1988-12-13· cited 48×
- Doe v. Bell Atlantic Business Systems Services, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1995-08-01· cited 29×
- Jones v. HirschfeldS.D. New York· 2003-12-09· cited 28×
- Doe v. EvansE.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-07-13· cited 27×
- Doe v. SmithE.D. New York· 1999-04-20· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.