John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding on facts essentially identical to those of the present case that plan limitations period was reasonable
• holding that contractual limitations periods “if reasonable 4 Because the parties did not raise the issue, we decline to pass on whether or not MMO’s partial-rescission claim states a claim for “equitable” relief under § 1132(a)(3
• suggesting that sealing specific documents is the appropriate mechanism to deal with a sensitive medical issue
• suggesting that sealing specific documents is the appropriate mechanism to deal with a sensitive medical issue
• noting that “fictitious names are allowed when necessary to protect the privacy of children, rape victims, and other particularly vulnerable parties or witnesses”
• finding that the presence of mental illness is not an automatic ground for concealing the identity of a party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).