Second Circuit· 1/18/2005

Huminski v. Corsones

Citations

396 F.3d 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that defendant was entitled to judicial immunity for barring litigant from courthouse because she “acted pursuant to Vermont law in ensuring the security of the courthouse”
concluding that trespass notices issued to plaintiff constituted “an unreasonable restriction on [his] expressive activity in a nonpublic forum,” and noting that “[s]uch broad restrictions are generally frowned upon even in nonpublic forums”
holding courthouse parking lot is not a public forum because there was no evidence the government did anything to designate it as such
holding that “courthouses, court lands, and parking lots” are nonpublic forums
agreeing that “the interior of a courthouse is not a public forum” and collecting cases
stating that state officials may be sued under Section 1983 in their individual capacities for both prospective and retrospective relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

124 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Huminski v. Corsones

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.