Doe v. Cabrera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 27-year-old victim of sexual assault would be allowed to proceed anonymously in suit against alleged attacker, but only through pretrial proceedings
• collecting cases containing allegations of sexual assault in which the plaintiffs were allowed to proceed under a pseudonym
• granting the plaintiff rape victim’s motion for pseudonymous filing because public disclosure could subject the plaintiff to “psychological trauma”
• “Having the plaintiff’s name in the public domain, especially in the Internet age, could subject the plaintiff to future unnecessary interrogation . . . as a result of bringing this case.”
• collecting cases in which a sexual assault victims were permitted to proceed anonymously
• granting use of pseudonym during preliminary stages of litigation but observing- that allowing the use of a pseudonym during trial would serve “as' a subliminal comment on the harm the alleged éncounter .'.. has caused the plaintiff’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).