E.D. New York· 4/20/1999
Doe v. Smith
Citations
- 105 F. Supp. 2d 40
- 1999 WL 33117395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there was no prejudice to defendant where it retained right to depose any and all witnesses, obtain any and all documents, and had not limited defendant’s rights or public access to a trial
- holding that there was no prejudice to defendant where it retained right to depose any and all witnesses, obtain any and all documents, and had not limited defendant's rights or public access to a trial
- granting motion to proceed anonymously where plaintiff presented detailed evidence of the psychological and emotional injury she would endure were the court to require her to identify herself
- allowing a plaintiff to proceed anonymously after considering documentation from medical professionals that predicted psychological and emotional pain that would “threaten [the plaintiff’s] stability, safety, and even her life”
- “Because the newly provided evidence pertains only to one factor, the court will not repeat [the full] factor analysis.”
- “[T]he presumption of openness in judicial proceedings can be overridden in exceptional circumstances.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Doe v. Del RioS.D. New York· 2006-12-11· cited 67×
- EW v. New York Blood CenterE.D. New York· 2003-02-19· cited 63×
- Doe No. 2 v. KolkoE.D. New York· 2006-11-03· cited 61×
- Doe v. HeitlerColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-04-26· cited 8×
- Doe v. Bloomberg L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2021-12-02· cited 1×
- Deer Consumer Products, Inc. v. LittleNew York Supreme Court· 2012-01-27· cited 1×
- In re Arbitration of Nordic PCL Construction, Inc. v. LIPHGC, LLC.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2015-07-23
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedFourth Circuit· 1993-10-04· cited 455×
- Doe v. StegallFifth Circuit· 1981-08-10· cited 298×
- Doe v. ShakurS.D. New York· 1996-01-22· cited 89×
- Doe v. Indiana Black Expo, Inc.S.D. Indiana· 1996-04-17· cited 32×
- Doe v. Bell Atlantic Business Systems Services, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1995-08-01· cited 29×
- Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode IslandD. Rhode Island· 1992-07-06· cited 19×
- Daniel C. Ligurotis, John Navigato and Sam Canino v. Herbert F. WhyteSeventh Circuit· 1992-01-08· cited 5×
Other cases named Doe v. Smith
19 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Doe v. SmithSixth Circuit· 1989-08-10· cited 25×
- Doe v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-12-18· cited 23×
- Doe v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2005-07-13· cited 14×
- Doe v. SmithS.D. New York· 1988-10-03· cited 13×
- Doe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court· 1849-11-27· cited 11×
- Doe v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court· 2016-09-22· cited 10×
- Doe v. SmithSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 8×
- Doe v. SmithE.D. New York· 1998-12-08· cited 2×
- Doe v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-01-31· cited 1×
- Doe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-08-24· cited 1×
- Doe v. SmithNew York Supreme Court· 2010-08-17· cited 1×
- Doe v. SmithNYC Family Court· 1993-01-29· cited 1×
- Doe v. SmithSixth Circuit· 1973-11-07
- Doe v. SmithC.D. Illinois· 2006-02-07
- Doe v. SmithNew York Supreme Court· 2000-03-31
- Doe v. SmithDistrict of Columbia· 2018-07-19
- Doe v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-11-17
- Doe v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-01-31
- Doe v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-10-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.