Second Circuit· 1/10/2025
Do No Harm v. Pfizer
Citations
- 126 F.4th 109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing 23 1 that a plaintiff has Article III standing to challenge “a discriminatory 2 policy [that] prevents” the plaintiff from applying to a program “on 3 equal footing”
- “[A] plaintiff need not go through the motions of formally applying when that would be a ‘futile gesture.’”
- “[A]n organizational plaintiff need not identify specific injured members by name at the pleading stage.”
- District Courts “cannot consider the merits of [a] preliminary injunction motion and should dismiss [a] claim altogether” if a plaintiff’s legal theory “doom[s] the plaintiff’s standing.”
- “When a preliminary injunction is sought, a plaintiff’s burden to demonstrate standing will normally be no less than that required on a motion for summary judgment.” (citation and alterations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Doe v. HochulSecond Circuit· 2025-06-03· cited 9×
- Xeriant, Inc. v. Auctus Fund LLCSecond Circuit· 2025-06-25· cited 7×
- Variscite NY Four, LLC v. New York State Cannabis Control BoardSecond Circuit· 2025-08-12
- Giambalvo v. Suffolk Cnty.Second Circuit· 2025-09-12
- Nathan Roberts v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co.Sixth Circuit· 2026-05-19
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court· 2016-05-16· cited 7,043×
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 6,493×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 4,065×
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 3,295×
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-03-25· cited 2,704×
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court· 2009-03-03· cited 2,335×
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 1,961×
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 1,360×
- Sealed v. Sealed 1Second Circuit· 2008-08-12· cited 1,156×
- Novak v. KasaksSecond Circuit· 2000-06-21· cited 579×
- Amidax Trading Group v. S.W.I.F.T. ScrlSecond Circuit· 2011-12-19· cited 487×
- Gratz v. BollingerSupreme Court· 2003-06-23· cited 444×
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackD.C. Circuit· 2015-12-22· cited 377×
- Katz v. Donna Karan Co.Second Circuit· 2017-09-19· cited 351×
- Cacchillo v. Insmed, Inc.Second Circuit· 2011-03-23· cited 281×
- Cave v. East Meadow Union Free School DistrictSecond Circuit· 2008-01-23· cited 275×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.