Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 1/10/2025

Do No Harm v. Pfizer

Citations

  • 126 F.4th 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing 23 1 that a plaintiff has Article III standing to challenge “a discriminatory 2 policy [that] prevents” the plaintiff from applying to a program “on 3 equal footing”
  • “[A] plaintiff need not go through the motions of formally applying when that would be a ‘futile gesture.’”
  • “[A]n organizational plaintiff need not identify specific injured members by name at the pleading stage.”
  • District Courts “cannot consider the merits of [a] preliminary injunction motion and should dismiss [a] claim altogether” if a plaintiff’s legal theory “doom[s] the plaintiff’s standing.”
  • “When a preliminary injunction is sought, a plaintiff’s burden to demonstrate standing will normally be no less than that required on a motion for summary judgment.” (citation and alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.