Skip to main content
· 3/28/1977

Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission

Citations

  • 430 U.S. 943
  • 97 S. Ct. 1576

About this case

Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission

This article **relies excessively on references to primary sources **. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources .
Find sources: "Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission"  – news  · newspapers  · books  · scholar  · JSTOR (November 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message )

Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 U.S. 333 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously struck down a North Carolina law prohibiting the sale of apples in closed containers marked with any apple grade other than the United States Department of Agriculture grade. However, displaying the USDA grade was not required. Washington state , a major apple producer, used apple standards superior to those used by the USDA. The Court found that North Carolina's law violated the Commerce Clause because they discriminated against Washington state apple producers while working to the advantage of local North Carolina apple growers.

John R. Jordan, Jr., argued the cause for Hunt. With him on the brief were Rufus L. Edmisten , Attorney General of North Carolina , and Millard R. Rich, Jr., Deputy Attorney General. Slade Gorton , Attorney General of Washington , argued the cause for the Washington State Apple Advertising Commission. With him on the brief were Edward B. Mackie, Deputy Attorney General, and James Arneil, Special Assistant Attorney General.

The Supreme Court decision established the concept of association standing, which allows for an association (in this case, the Commission) that represents one or more parties that have demonstrable injury to bring the case to trial with standing under Article III .[1]

See also

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: See also")

References

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: References")

  1. "Supreme Court's Thomas questions ability of groups to challenge US laws | Reuters" . Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2026.

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: External links")

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunt_v._Washington_State_Apple_Advertising_Commission&oldid=1351942805 "

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.