Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court· 3/25/2014

Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1377
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 392
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2214
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 4195
  • 572 U.S. 118
  • 109 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2061
  • 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 623
  • 2014 WL 1168967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that proximate cause was well pled when there was \very close to a 1:1 relationship\ between the direct victim's and the plaintiff's injuries
  • concluding that the zone-of-interests analysis is a question of statutory interpretation that “requires us to determine the meaning of the congressionally enacted provision creating a cause of action”
  • concluding that a company’s 11 “allegations of lost sales and damage to its business reputation give it standing under Article III”
  • concluding that the plaintiff ordinarily must show injury “flowing directly from the deception wrought by the defendant’s advertising”
  • recognizing that a plaintiff may satisfy Article III standing requirements while still failing to establish statutory standing under the Lanham Act
  • concluding that statutory standing concerns only whether a plain tiff “has a cause of action,” not subject-matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scalia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,160 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.