Skip to main content

Diller v. Diller

Citations

  • 182 N.E.3d 370
  • 2021 Ohio 4252

Syllabus

Under the plain language of R.C. 2107.52(A)(3) and (B)(2)(a), the testamentary gift from the testator to his predeceased brother is not one of the types of testamentary gifts entitled to the protections of the anti-lapse statute. Therefore, the trial court erred by finding that a substitute gift is created in favor of the predeceased brother's surviving descendants.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.