· 1/14/1935
Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJ
Citations
- 294 U.S. 87
- 55 S. Ct. 333
- 79 L. Ed. 780
- 1935 U.S. LEXIS 263
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejection of proposed amendment as relevant factor in statutory interpretation
- rejection of proposed amendment as relevant factor in statutory interpretation
- “[D]efinition by the average man or even by the ordinary dictionary with its studied enumeration of subtle shades of meaning is not a substitute for the definition set before us by the lawmakers with instructions to apply it to the exclusion of all others.”
- rejection of amendment evidence of intent
- rejection of amendment evidence of intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cardozo, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, Butler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.