Skip to main content
· 1/14/1935

Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJ

Citations

  • 294 U.S. 87
  • 55 S. Ct. 333
  • 79 L. Ed. 780
  • 1935 U.S. LEXIS 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejection of proposed amendment as relevant factor in statutory interpretation
  • rejection of proposed amendment as relevant factor in statutory interpretation
  • “[D]efinition by the average man or even by the ordinary dictionary with its studied enumeration of subtle shades of meaning is not a substitute for the definition set before us by the lawmakers with instructions to apply it to the exclusion of all others.”
  • rejection of amendment evidence of intent
  • rejection of amendment evidence of intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardozo, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, Butler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.