Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a provision in a statute must be read in the broader context of the law
• emphasizing that “[w]e are not talking about extending EPA jurisdiction over millions of previously unregulated entities”
• noting that the Court would expect Congress to speak clearly if it wished \to assign to an agency decisions of vast 'economic and political significance.' \
• observing that “[w]e review EPA’s interpretations of the Clean Air Act using the standard set forth in” Chevron
• stating that “words of a statute must be read in their context and with a viéw to their place in the overall statutory' scheme” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• holding that the EPA exceeded its statutory authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).