Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the term ‘including is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle”
• holding that “the term ‘including’ is not one of all-embracing definition, but simply connotes an illustrative application of the general principle.”
• concluding that the use of the word “including” in a statutory definition conveys that other kindred items may be included within that definition, even if the items are not explicitly listed
• noting that “the term ‘including’ is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle”
• noting that generally “the term ‘including’ is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle”
• noting that “the term ‘including’ is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).